Les meilleures études en 2023 adaptées aux soins primaires: De l'équipe du groupe PEER.

OBJECTIF: Faire la synthèse de 10 articles médicaux de grande qualité, publiés en 2023 et susceptibles d'intéresser les médecins de famille. SÉLECTION DES DONNÉES PROBANTES: L'équipe du groupe PEER (Patients, Expérience, Évidence, Recherche), formée de professionnels des soins primaires qui s'intéressent à la médecine fondée sur des données probantes, a fait la sélection et le classement des articles. Le processus de sélection comportait une surveillance systématique des tables des matières de revues médicales à fort impact et un repérage continu dans EvidenceAlerts. La priorité accordée aux articles se fondait sur leur applicabilité directe aux soins primaires et sur leur influence potentielle sur la pratique. MESSAGE PRINCIPAL: Les articles choisis portaient sur divers domaines cliniques des soins primaires. Au nombre des sujets traités figuraient les suivants : la comparaison d'une approche thérapeutique visant une cible par rapport à la prescription de statines à forte intensité pour le contrôle des lipides; le sémaglutide et ses effets sur les issues cardiovasculaires; le vaccin contre le virus respiratoire syncytial chez les adultes plus âgés; le chlorthalidone par rapport à l'hydrochlorothiazide dans la prévention des incidents cardiovasculaires; l'amitriptyline pour le syndrome du côlon irritable; le rôle des opioïdes dans les cas de lombalgie aiguë; l'innocuité des provocations par voie orale à la pénicilline pour les personnes qui y sont allergiques; le spironolactone pour l'acné facial; les stratégies pour inverser la fragilité chez les adultes plus âgés; et l'identification des principaux acteurs dans la prise en charge des maladies chroniques. Deux médicaments prometteurs « à venir ¼ sont aussi mentionnés : le rétatrutide pour la perte pondérale et le fézolinétant pour les symptômes vasomoteurs de la ménopause. CONCLUSION: La recherche publiée en 2023 a produit plusieurs articles de grande qualité sur divers sujets d'intérêt en soins primaires, dont les soins cardiovasculaires, le syndrome du côlon irritable, les soins aux aînés et la prise en charge de l'acné.

Top studies of 2023 relevant to primary care: From the PEER team.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a summary of the noteworthy medical articles published in 2023 that are relevant to family physicians. SELECTING THE EVIDENCE: Articles were chosen and ranked by the PEER (Patients, Experience, Evidence, Research) team, a group of primary care health professionals focused on evidence-based medicine. The selection process involved routine surveillance of tables of contents in high-impact medical journals and continuous monitoring of EvidenceAlerts. Articles were prioritized based on their direct applicability to and potential to influence primary care practice. MAIN MESSAGE: Selected articles addressed various clinical areas of primary care. The topics included a comparison of a treat-to-target approach versus a high-intensity statins prescription for lipid management; semaglutide and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes; respiratory syncytial virus vaccine for older adults; chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide in preventing cardiovascular events; amitriptyline for irritable bowel syndrome; the role of opioids in acute back pain; safety of oral penicillin challenges in patients allergic to penicillin; spironolactone for facial acne; strategies to reverse frailty in older adults; and identifying the provider of chronic disease management. Two "up and coming" medications are also mentioned: retatrutide for weight loss and fezolinetant for vasomotor symptoms of menopause. CONCLUSION: Research published in 2023 yielded several high-quality articles with topics relevant to primary care, including cardiovascular care, irritable bowel syndrome, care of the elderly, and acne management.

PEER simplified lipid guideline 2023 update: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2015 clinical practice guideline and provide a simplified approach to lipid management in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for primary care. METHODS: Following the Institute of Medicine's Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust, a multidisciplinary, pan-Canadian guideline panel was formed. This panel was represented by primary care providers, free from conflicts of interest with industry, and included the patient perspective. A separate scientific evidence team performed evidence reviews on statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors, fibrates, bile acid sequestrants, niacin, and omega-3 supplements (docosahexaenoic acid with eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] or EPA ethyl ester alone [icosapent]), as well as on 11 supplemental questions. Recommendations were finalized by the guideline panel through use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RECOMMENDATIONS: All recommendations are presented in a patient-centred manner designed with the needs of family physicians and other primary care providers in mind. Many recommendations are similar to those published in 2015. Statins remain first-line therapy for both primary and secondary CVD prevention, and the Mediterranean diet and physical activity are recommended to reduce cardiovascular risk (primary and secondary prevention). The guideline panel recommended against using lipoprotein a, apolipoprotein B, or coronary artery calcium levels when assessing cardiovascular risk, and recommended against targeting specific lipid levels. The team also reviewed new evidence pertaining to omega-3 fatty acids (including EPA ethyl ester [icosapent]) and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors, and outlined when to engage in informed shared decision making with patients on interventions to lower cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSION: These updated evidence-based guidelines provide a simplified approach to lipid management for the prevention and management of CVD. These guidelines were created by and for primary health care professionals and their patients.

Lipid-lowering therapies for cardiovascular disease prevention and management in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapies used to prevent or manage cardiovascular disease including bile acid sequestrants (BAS), ezetimibe, fibrates, niacin, omega-3 supplements, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and statins. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a grey literature search. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and March 2022 looking at statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, fibrates, BAS, niacin, and omega-3 supplements for preventing cardiovascular outcomes were selected. Outcomes of interest included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. SYNTHESIS: A total of 76 systematic reviews were included. Four randomized controlled trials were also included for BAS because no efficacy systematic review was identified. Statins significantly reduced MACE (6 systematic reviews; median risk ratio [RR]=0.74; interquartile range [IQR]=0.71 to 0.76), cardiovascular mortality (7 systematic reviews; median RR=0.85, IQR=0.83 to 0.86), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.88 to 0.92). Major adverse cardiovascular events were also significantly reduced by ezetimibe (3 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94), PCSK9 inhibitors (14 systematic reviews; median RR=0.84, IQR=0.83 to 0.87), and fibrates (2 systematic reviews; mean RR=0.86), but these interventions had no effect on cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Fibrates had no effect on any cardiovascular outcomes when added to a statin. Omega-3 combination supplements had no effect on MACE or all-cause mortality but significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94). Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester alone significantly reduced MACE (1 systematic review, RR=0.78) and cardiovascular mortality (2 systematic reviews; RRs of 0.82 and 0.82). In primary cardiovascular prevention, only statins showed consistent benefits on MACE (6 systematic reviews; median RR=0.75, IQR=0.73 to 0.78), cardiovascularall-cause mortality (7 systematic reviews, median RR=0.83, IQR=0.81 to 0.90), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.87 to 0.91). CONCLUSION: Statins have the most consistent evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular complications with a relative risk reduction of about 25% for MACE and 10% to 15% for mortality. The addition of ezetimibe, a PCSK9 inhibitor, or eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester to a statin provides additional MACE risk reduction but has no effect on all-cause mortality.

Lignes directrices simplifiées de PEER sur les lipides : actualisation 2023: Prévention et prise en charge des maladies cardiovasculaires en soins primaires.

OBJECTIF: Actualiser le guide de pratique clinique de 2015 et présenter une approche simplifiée de la prise en charge des lipides dans la prévention des maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV) en première ligne. MÉTHODES: Conformément aux recommandations de l'Institute of Medicine dans Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust, un panel pancanadien d'experts multidisciplinaires en lignes directrices a été formé. Ce panel était représentatif des cliniciens en soins primaires, libre de tout conflit d'intérêts avec l'industrie, et il tenait compte des points de vue des patients. Une équipe distincte, responsable des données probantes scientifiques, a passé en revue l'information sur les statines, l'ézétimibe, les inhibiteurs de la proprotéine convertase subtilisine-kexine de type 9, les fibrates, les chélateurs des acides biliaires, la niacine et les suppléments d'omega-3 (acide docosahexaénoïque avec acide eicosapentaénoïque [EPA] ou ester éthylique de l'EPA seul [icosapent]), ainsi que sur la réponse à 11 questions supplémentaires. Le panel des lignes directrices a finalisé les recommandations en utilisant la méthodologie GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). RECOMMANDATIONS: Toutes les recommandations sont présentées de manière à être centrées sur le patient et conçues en ayant à l'esprit les besoins des médecins de famille et des autres cliniciens des soins primaires. De nombreuses recommandations sont semblables à celles publiées en 2015. Les statines demeurent le traitement de première intention pour la prévention tant primaire que secondaire des MCV, et le régime méditerranéen et l'activité physique sont recommandés pour réduire le risque cardiovasculaire (en prévention primaire et secondaire). Le panel des lignes directrices a recommandé de ne pas utiliser le dosage des lipoprotéines a, des apolipoprotéines B ou le score calcique coronarien (SCC) dans l'évaluation du risque cardiovasculaire, et de ne pas cibler de seuils précis de taux lipidiques. L'équipe a aussi passé en revue de nouvelles données concernant les acides gras omega-3 (y compris l'ester éthylique d'EAP [icosapent]) et les inhibiteurs de la proprotéine convertase subtilisine-kexine de type 9, et a précisé les moments où il convient de procéder à une prise de décision partagée avec les patients sur les interventions pour diminuer le risque cardiovasculaire. CONCLUSION: Ces lignes directrices actualisées et fondées sur des données probantes présentent une approche simplifiée de la prise en charge des lipides pour la prévention et le traitement des MCV. Ce guide de pratique clinique a été conçu par et pour des professionnels de la santé en soins primaires et leurs patients.

Top studies of 2021 relevant to primary care: From the PEER team.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize 10 high-quality studies or guidelines from 2021 that have strong relevance to physicians in comprehensive family practice. SELECTING THE EVIDENCE: Routine literature surveillance of abstracts in high-impact journals and EvidenceAlerts was completed by the PEER (Patients, Experience, Evidence, Research) team, a group of health care professionals with a research interest in evidence-based medicine and primary care. Abstracts were screened, selected, and ranked by the PEER team. MAIN MESSAGE: The articles from 2021 that are most likely to impact primary care practice discuss the following topics: empagliflozin for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; semaglutide for weight loss; stopping antidepressants in primary care; inhaled budesonide for COVID-19; acetylsalicylic acid for preeclampsia prevention; quarter-dose blood pressure medications for hypertension; aggressive blood pressure control for elderly patients; kangaroo care for low-birth-weight infants; footwear for knee osteoarthritis; and delayed antibiotics for pediatric respiratory infections. Two "honourable mention" studies are also briefly reviewed. CONCLUSION: Research from 2021 produced several high-quality studies in cardiovascular care but also addressed a variety of conditions relevant to primary care including weight loss, depression, and COVID-19.

Les meilleures études de 2021 adéquates pour les soins de première ligne: De l'équipe du groupe PEER.

OBJECTIF: Résumer 10 études ou lignes directrices de grande qualité publiées en 2021 qui présentent un intérêt marqué pour les médecins qui ont une pratique familiale complète. SÉLECTION DES DONNÉES PROBANTES: L'équipe PEER (Patients, Experience, Evidence, Research), un groupe de professionnels de la santé dont la recherche s'intéresse à la médecine fondée sur les données probantes et à la médecine de première ligne, a systématiquement surveillé les résumés publiés dans les revues savantes importantes et dans EvidenceAlerts. L'équipe PEER a passé au crible, sélectionné et placé les résumés en ordre d'importance. MESSAGE PRINCIPAL: Les articles publiés en 2021 qui influeront le plus probablement sur la pratique de première ligne traitent des sujets suivants : empagliflozine contre l'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection préservée; sémaglutide pour perdre du poids; arrêter les antidépresseurs en première ligne; budésonide par inhalation contre la COVID-19; acide acétylsalicylique en prévention de la prééclampsie; quart de dose d'antihypertenseurs contre l'hypertension; contrôle énergique de la tension artérielle chez les patients âgés; méthode kangourou pour les nouveau-nés de faible poids; chaussures pour la gonarthrose; et report de l'antibiothérapie pour les infections respiratoires pédiatriques. On jette également un coup d'œil rapide à deux « mentions honorables ¼. CONCLUSION: En 2021, la recherche a produit plusieurs études de grande qualité dans le domaine des soins cardiovasculaires, mais elle a également porté sur une gamme d'affections présentant un intérêt pour les soins de première ligne, dont la perte pondérale, la dépression et la COVID-19.

Evidence reversals in primary care research: a study of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-Based Medicine is built on the premise that clinicians can be more confident when their decisions are grounded in high-quality evidence. Furthermore, evidence from studies involving patient-oriented outcomes is preferred when making decisions about tests or treatments. Ideally, the findings of relevant and valid trials should be stable over time, that is, unlikely to be reversed in subsequent research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability of evidence from trials relevant to primary healthcare and to identify study characteristics associated with their reversal. METHODS: We studied synopses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2002 to 2005 as "Daily POEMs" (Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters). The initial evidence (E1) from these POEMs (2002-2005) was compared with the updated evidence (E2) on that same topic in a summary resource (DynaMed 2019). Two physician-raters independently categorized each POEM-RCT as (i) reversed when E1 ≠ E2, or as (ii) not reversed, when E1 = E2. For all "Evidence Reversals" (E1 ≠ E2), we assessed the direction of change in the evidence. RESULTS: We evaluated 408 POEMs on RCTs. Of those, 35 (9%; 95% confidence interval [6-12]) were identified as reversed, 359 (88%) were identified as not reversed, and 14 (3%) were indeterminate. On average, this represents about 2 evidence reversals per annum for POEMs about RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Over 12-17 years, 9% of RCTs summarized as POEMs are reversed. Information alerting services that apply strict criteria for relevance and validity of clinical information are likely to identify RCTs whose findings are stable over time.

We studied the extent to which evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to primary care is contradicted in subsequent research. When it was, we identified this event as an evidence reversal. In addition, we sought to identify characteristics of RCTs associated with their reversal. From 408 RCTs published during the period 2002­2005, study characteristics such as sample size were identified and extracted. Subsequently, we compared the evidence reported in each of these RCTs with the evidence on that same topic in an online summary resource in 2019. This allowed us to classify each RCT in one of the following 3 categories: evidence confirmed, reversed, or uncertain if this evidence is confirmed or reversed. Over 12­17 years of follow-up time, the findings of about 9 in 10 RCTs summarized as POEMs are stable. We found no statistically significant associations between trial characteristics and their subsequent reversal. This low rate of evidence reversal is good news for the RCTs that are used to inform decision-making.

A pilot study of a longitudinal mindfulness curriculum in undergraduate medical education.

BACKGROUND: To support student well-being, a mindfulness curriculum in undergraduate medical education was launched at our university in 2014. We describe the program and report 3-year results. METHODS: Medical students responded to online questionnaires on mindfulness (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory), empathy (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) and perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and were surveyed for demographics, home practice, and subjective experience at curriculum launch and yearly for 3 years. RESULTS: In respondents, high stress (19.2 (SD=6)) and low resilience (71.2 (SD=12.5)) scores were seen throughout training. Scores for mindfulness correlated positively with those for empathy (r=.217 p < 0.01) and resilience (r = .539, p < 0.01), and negatively with stress scores (r = -.380, p < 0.01). While overall scale scores did not statistically change after curriculum implementation, statistically significant increases were seen in mindfulness (12%, p = 0.008), empathy (5%, p = 0.045), and resilience scores (12%, p = 0.002) with a trend toward lower stress scores (8%, p =0.080) in respondents who felt they applied the curriculum principles. Two hours of reported home practice per week was associated with statistically significant changes (14% increased mindfulness scores p < 0.001; 6% increased empathy scores p < 0.001, 10% increased resilience scores p = 0.003; 11% decreased stress scores p = 0.008). Despite positive program evaluations for both mandatory and elective sessions, student attendance at elective sessions was low. CONCLUSION: A mindfulness curriculum integrated into formal undergraduate medical education is feasible. Benefits may be confined to those students who apply curriculum principles and practice regularly. Further study is needed.Résumé. CONTEXTE: Pour soutenir le bien-être des étudiants, un cursus de méditation pleine conscience dans le cadre du programme de doctorat en médecine a été lancé à notre université en 2014. Nous décrivons le programme et communiquons les résultats après trois ans. MÉTHODES: Des étudiants en médecine ont répondu à des questionnaires en ligne sur la pleine conscience (inventaire de pleine conscience de Freiburg), l'empathie (Échelle de Jefferson sur l'empathie du médecin), la résilience (échelle de résilience de Connor-Davidson) et le stress perçu (échelle du stress perçu) et ont été interrogés pour les caractéristiques démographiques, la pratique de la méditation pleine conscience à domicile et l'expérience subjective au moment du lancement du cursus et, ensuite, annuellement pendant trois ans. RÉSULTATS: Chez les répondants, un degré de stress élevé (19,2 (ET=6)) et une faible résilience (71,2 (ET=12,5)) ont été observés tout au long de la formation. Il y avait une corrélation positive entre les la pleine conscience et l'empathie (r=0,17, p<0,01) et de la résilience (r=0,539, p<0,01), et négative avec le stress (r=-0,380, p<0,01). Alors que les résultats globaux ne changent pas statistiquement après la mise en œuvre du cursus, des augmentations statistiquement significatives ont été observées pour la pleine conscience (12%, p=0,008), l'empathie (5%, p=0,045) et la résilience (12%, p=0,002) avec une tendance vers des résultats inférieurs pour le stress (8%, p=0,080) chez les répondants qui estimaient avoir appliqué les principes du programme. On retrouvait des changements significatifs chez les répondants qui rapportaient avoir pratiqué deux heures par semaine à domicile (résultats accrus de 14% pour la pleine conscience (p<0,001), de 6% pour l'empathie (p<0,001) et de 10% pour la résilience (p= 0,003), et réduits de 11% pour le stress (p=0,008)). Malgré des évaluations de programme positives pour les sessions obligatoires et optionnelles, l'assiduité des étudiants aux sessions optionnelles était faible. CONCLUSION: Un cursus de méditation pleine conscience intégré dans des études formelles de doctorat en médecine est faisable. Les avantages peuvent être confinés aux étudiants qui appliquent les principes du programme et qui le pratiquent sur une base régulière. D'autres études sont requises.

Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Medical education should portray evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision making (SDM) as central to patient care. However, misconceptions regarding EBM and SDM are common in clinical practice, and these biases might unintentionally be transmitted to medical trainees through a hidden curriculum. The current study explores how assumptions of EBM and SDM can be hidden in formal curriculum material such as PowerPoint slides. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis using a purposive sample of 18 PowerPoints on the management of upper respiratory tract infections. We identified concepts pertaining to decision making using theory-driven codes taken from the fields of EBM and SDM. We then re-analyzed the coded text using a constructivist latent thematic approach to develop a rich description of conceptualizations of decision making in relation to EBM and SDM frameworks. RESULTS: PowerPoint slides can relay a hidden curriculum, which can normalize: pathophysiological reasoning, unexplained variations in clinical care, the use of EBM mimics, defensive medicine, an unrealistic portrayal of benefits, and paternalism. DISCUSSION: Addressing the hidden curriculum in formal curricular material should be explored as a novel strategy to foster a positive attitude towards EBM and SDM and to improve patient outcomes by encouraging the use of these skills.

Are potentially clinically meaningful benefits misinterpreted in cardiovascular randomized trials? A systematic examination of statistical significance, clinical significance, and authors' conclusions.

BACKGROUND: While journals and reporting guidelines recommend the presentation of confidence intervals, many authors adhere strictly to statistically significant testing. Our objective was to determine what proportions of not statistically significant (NSS) cardiovascular trials include potentially clinically meaningful effects in primary outcomes and if these are associated with authors' conclusions. METHODS: Cardiovascular studies published in six high-impact journals between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014 were identified via PubMed. Two independent reviewers selected trials with major adverse cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death) as primary outcomes and extracted data on trial characteristics, quality, and primary outcome. Potentially clinically meaningful effects were defined broadly as a relative risk point estimate ≤0.94 (based on the effects of ezetimibe) and/or a lower confidence interval ≤0.75 (based on the effects of statins). RESULTS: We identified 127 randomized trial comparisons from 3200 articles. The primary outcomes were statistically significant (SS) favoring treatment in 21% (27/127), NSS in 72% (92/127), and SS favoring control in 6% (8/127). In 61% of NSS trials (56/92), the point estimate and/or lower confidence interval included potentially meaningful effects. Both point estimate and confidence interval included potentially meaningful effects in 67% of trials (12/18) in which authors' concluded that treatment was superior, in 28% (16/58) with a neutral conclusion, and in 6% (1/16) in which authors' concluded that control was superior. In a sensitivity analysis, 26% of NSS trials would include potential meaningful effects with relative risk thresholds of point estimate ≤0.85 and/or a lower confidence interval ≤0.65. CONCLUSIONS: Point estimates and/or confidence intervals included potentially clinically meaningful effects in up to 61% of NSS cardiovascular trials. Authors' conclusions often reflect potentially meaningful results of NSS cardiovascular trials. Given the frequency of potentially clinical meaningful effects in NSS trials, authors should be encouraged to continue to look beyond significance testing to a broader interpretation of trial results.

A vesicular transport pathway shuttles cargo from mitochondria to lysosomes.

Mitochondrial respiration relies on electron transport, an essential yet dangerous process in that it leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS can be neutralized within the mitochondria through enzymatic activity, yet the mechanism for steady-state removal of oxidized mitochondrial protein complexes and lipids is not well understood. We have previously characterized vesicular profiles budding from the mitochondria that carry selected cargo. At least one population of these mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs) targets the peroxisomes; however, the fate of the majority of MDVs was unclear. Here, we demonstrate that MDVs carry selected cargo to the lysosomes. Using a combination of confocal and electron microscopy, we observe MDVs in steady state and demonstrate that they are stimulated as an early response to oxidative stress, the extent of which is determined by the respiratory status of the mitochondria. Delivery to the lysosomes does not require mitochondrial depolarization and is independent of ATG5 and LC3, suggesting that vesicle delivery complements mitophagy. Consistent with this, ultrastructural analysis of MDV formation revealed Tom20-positive structures within the vesicles of multivesicular bodies. These data characterize a novel vesicle transport route between the mitochondria and lysosomes, providing insights into the basic mechanisms of mitochondrial quality control.